Saints Basil the Great and Gregory Nazianzen, Bishops and Doctors – Readings

Tools: Email; Print; Font-size

Commentary on Ephesians 4:1-7,11-13; Psalm 22; Matthew 23:8-12

In the Gospel, which is from Matthew, Jesus calls on his followers to avoid all honorary titles.  Every member of the community, irrespective of their role, has only one Master and all are brothers and sisters to each other.   All are called to serve each other, to seek the well-being of every other member through agape-love.  And, in any community, those are greatest who provide the most effective service.  Both Basil and Gregory were bishops, but at heart they remained true to their original callings as monks and hermits.  Their lives were lived not to rule or dominate but to heal the divisions among their communities.

The First Reading, from the Letter to the Ephesians, emphasises first, the unity which must bind the community.  A unity which comes from being members of one Body, with one Faith, one Lord, one God, one hope and one Baptism.

The Church in the time of Basil and Gregory was seriously divided by the Arian heresy and it was through their efforts that unity was restored.   Unity, however, does not mean uniformity; we are not clones of each other.  And so, as the Reading says, real unity only happens when people with different characteristics and callings, different responsibilities work together towards one goal—the establishment of God’s Kingdom. For us, their lives, committed to unity and service, are highly relevant for us today.

Boo
Comments Off on Saints Basil the Great and Gregory Nazianzen, Bishops and Doctors – Readings

5th day in the Octave of Christmas – Gospel

Tools: Email; Print; Font-size

Commentary on Luke 2:22-35

The Holy Family was a Jewish family and both Jesus and his parents are shown as faithfully carrying out the requirements of the Law. In today’s Gospel there is a double ceremony described: one is the purification of the mother and the second is the offering of the first-born child to the Lord (in the past, we used to refer to the upcoming feast on February 2 as the Purification, but now it is called the “Presentation”).

Clearly, the notion of the need for a mother to be purified after giving birth is not something we feel necessary now. However, for the Jews during this time, the spilling of blood was a source of uncleanness. So, after giving birth, there had to be, after a designated number of days, a ceremony of purification. Sometimes the husband also went through a similar ceremony. Given the special circumstances surrounding the birth of Jesus, the idea of purification seems even less necessary, although Luke does not seem to have any problem with it.

According to the Mosaic law (Lev 12:2-8), a woman who gave birth to a boy was not allowed to touch anything sacred for 40 days (and in the case of a baby girl, the period was even longer), nor could she enter the Temple precincts because of her ritual ‘impurity’. At the end of this period, as mentioned by Luke, she was required to offer a year-old lamb as a burnt offering and a turtle dove or a young pigeon as expiation for sin. Those who could not afford the lamb could offer two birds instead.

The parents also presented their first-born son as an offering to the Lord, again in accordance with Jewish law (Exod 13:2,12), but this did not have to be done in the Temple. Presenting the child in the Temple seems to re-echo the scene in the First Book of Samuel where Hannah offers her son Samuel for service in the sanctuary. There is no mention in Luke’s account of the five shekels that was supposed to be paid to a member of the priestly family to ‘buy back’ the child.

The account goes on to mention two elderly people – Simeon and Anna (Anna will appear tomorrow). They represented all those devout Jews who were looking forward to the expected coming of the Messiah and the restoration of God’s rule, God’s kingship, in Israel.

Simeon had received a promise that he would not die until he had laid eyes on the Messiah. Under the promptings of the Spirit, Simeon enters the Temple just as Mary and Joseph arrive with their child. He recognises who the Child is and then says a prayer of thanksgiving and surrender to his God. We call this prayer the Nunc dimittis (“…now you are dismissing your servant in peace…”), a hymn which is now used during the Night Prayer of the Church. In harmony with Luke’s vision of Jesus, he describes Jesus as a Light for the Gentiles and the Glory of the people of Israel. And so, the Feast of the Presentation (which we now celebrate on February 2nd) is a feast of light sometimes called ‘Candlemas’. It is a time when candles are blessed and lit to reflect Christ as our Light.

Meanwhile Mary and Joseph are astounded at what is being said about their child. Even they have not yet come to a full realisation of just who he is.

But all is not sweetness and light. Simeon goes on to say some hard-sounding words. He says:

This child is destined for the falling and the rising of many in Israel and to be a sign that will be opposed so that the inner thoughts of many will be revealed…

To say that Jesus brings about the fall of people is a difficult idea to come to terms with. It seems to fly in the face of the loving, forgiving and compassionate Jesus of the Gospel. And yet the paradox is that many, for reasons of their own, can totally reject the way of life that Jesus proposes. In doing so, they also turn away from the direction where their fulfilment as persons lies. Jesus’ life is a sign, a sign which points us in the direction of God, but there are many who contradict that sign and go in other directions.

And Simeon has more to say. To Jesus’ Mother he also says:

…and a sword will pierce your own soul, too.

Mary will not know the meaning of these words for many years to come, although a small foretaste will come when Jesus is lost as a boy in Jerusalem. Mary may be full of grace, but no more than her Son will she spared be from sharing some of the pain he will ultimately endure. It is all part of that unconditional ‘Yes’ which Mary made to the angel in Nazareth. It too is contained in the offering of her Son that she has just made to God his Father.

There is a scene in the Gospel of Luke where a woman, having been impressed by the teaching of Jesus, cries out:

Blessed is the womb that bore you and the breasts that nursed you! (Luke 11:27)

A great tribute to Mary for having produced such a magnificent Son. But Jesus replies:

Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and obey it! (Luke 11:28)

Mary’s true greatness is not in the privileges bestowed on her by God, but in her unconditional acceptance of everything God asked of her. For each one of us it is the same. Today, let us say a big ‘Yes’ to God no matter what he sends us.

Boo
Comments Off on 5th day in the Octave of Christmas – Gospel

5th Day in the Octave of Christmas – First Reading

Tools: Email; Print; Font-size

Commentary on 1 John 2:3-11

The first part of John’s Letter (1:5 – 2:28) can be entitled: ‘To walk in the light’. It is divided into four ‘conditions’ for doing this. Yesterday’s reading described the first condition, which was ‘to break with sin’. Today’s reading looks at the second condition if we are to ‘walk in the light’.  And that condition is to keep the commandments, especially that of love. 

The reading begins by saying that we know we have come to know God when we keep his commandments, but:

Whoever says, “I have come to know [God]”, but does not obey his commandments is a liar, and in such a person the truth does not exist…

These words are clearly directed against the Gnostics, who said that all that mattered was to be united with the spiritual. The material was evil and devoid of any reality.  Hence anything done on the material level did not matter, including what we would regard as immoral, indecent, hurtful and violent actions against others.  According to the Gnostic way of thinking, the commandments, thus, insofar as they involved the material, including our own bodies and those of others, had no validity.

We might add that, though we may not see ourselves as Gnostics, ‘knowing’ God is not something merely intellectual. Nor is it an obsession with doctrinal orthodoxy on which some people seem to base their adherence to the Church. To ‘know’ God is much more something relational, calling for love and intimacy and based on experience. The letter says that anyone who follows the guidance of God, including actions involving what is material, is ‘in God’. And we have a very concrete example to follow:

…whoever says, “I abide in him,” ought to walk in the same way as he walked.

It is clear that the “him” refers to Jesus, who is the human paradigm of God on earth, and who is the example we are to follow.  He is the Way.

The letter now goes on to say that what has just been said represents not only an “old commandment” but also a “new” one.  This section begins with the greeting: “Beloved”.  The word is translated in various forms, e.g. ‘my dear friends’ in the New Jerusalem Bible.  The Greek is agapetoi and comes from the word for ‘love’ (agape) which we will be discussing at length later on in this letter.  The ”old commandment” is expressed in the instruction to love God with all our heart and our neighbour as ourselves, a commandment going back to the Old Testament and still valid. It is also embraced by the Ten Commandments.

Yet, the letter is also bringing a “new commandment”.  It is the new commandment that Jesus gave, during the Last Supper:

Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. (John 13:34)

In the Old Testament, the commandment to love the neighbour was one among many, and there was some doubt as to who the ‘neighbour’ might be (see Luke 10:29).  Jesus went much further.  He asked his followers not just to love their neighbour as themselves, but to love each other as he did.  And, to make that perfectly clear, he later said that the greatest love a person could show was to give their life for their friends – just as he did.  And that love was to be unconditionally extended to every single person. That is the way God himself acts – his love is extended to all, just as the sun shines and the rain falls on all equally. Therefore:

Whoever says, “I am in the light,” while hating a brother or sister, is still in the darkness.

The Gnostics, through their ‘special’ knowledge, believed they were in the light, but by acting harmfully against their brothers and sisters – they were still in darkness. On the other hand:

Whoever loves a brother or sister abides in the light…

This is all we need to know to live in the light – to extend an unconditional hand of love to every single person. So simple and yet so difficult! One who refuses to live in this way:

…walks in the darkness, and does not know the way to go…

Without this kind of love, they are blind.

Boo
Comments Off on 5th Day in the Octave of Christmas – First Reading

1 John 1:5-2:2

Tools: Email; Print; Font-size

Commentary on 1 John 1:5-2:2 Read 1 John 1:5-2:2 »

Boo
Comments Off on 1 John 1:5-2:2

Saint John, Apostle and Evangelist – First Reading

Tools: Email; Print; Font-size

Commentary on 1 John 1:1-4

Today, on this feast of St John, Apostle and Evangelist, we begin reading from the First Letter of John and will continue to do so until early January. Today’s reading of the first four verses forms an introduction to the letter.

Already at this early stage in the Church, there were those who could not accept that the Son of God could have taken on a genuinely human body.  In a mistaken zeal for the spiritual, they condemned everything material as evil, and they held that the humanity of Jesus could only be a mirage, an appearance.  To be fully united with God meant to withdraw as much as possible from everything material.

The people who held such views were known as Gnostics and, because they are such a concern of the author of this Letter, we might list some of their main ideas:

  • The human body, which is matter, is evil.  It is to be contrasted with God, who is totally spirit and therefore good.
  • Salvation is escape from the body, achieved not by faith in Christ, but by special knowledge. The Greek word for knowledge is gnosis, and hence the derivation of their name.
  • The Gnostics denied Christ’s true humanity in two ways. First, some said that Christ only seemed to have a human body, a view called Docetism (from the Greek dokeo, meaning ‘to seem’); and second, others said that the divine Christ joined the man Jesus at Baptism and left him before he died—a view called Cerinthianism, after its most prominent spokesman, Cerinthus.  It is this second version that we meet in 1 John 1:1; 2:22; 4:2-3.
  • Since the body was considered evil, it was to be treated harshly.  This ascetic form of Gnosticism is the background to part of the letter to the Colossians (2:21-23).
  • Paradoxically, this dualism also led to licentious behaviour.  The reasoning was that, since matter—and not the breaking of God’s law (1 Jn 3:4)—was considered evil, breaking his law was of no moral consequence.

The Gnosticism addressed in the New Testament was an earlier form of the heresy, not the intricately developed system of the 2nd and 3rd centuries.  Mention of Gnosticism can be found in John’s letters, Colossians 1 and 2, Timothy, Titus and 2 Peter, perhaps even in 1 Corinthians.

The writings of John are a total rejection of this position.  The Word not only became a human being; John, in his Prologue, says provocatively that the Word was “made flesh”.  He fully entered into our material condition, blessed it and sanctified it.

And in today’s reading too he emphasises contact with a real, bodily Jesus.  Although the Word existed “from the beginning”, what we have heard, we have seen with our own eyes and we have touched with our hands. And, of course, similarly after the Resurrection, Jesus invites the sceptical Thomas to touch and feel him:

Put your finger here and see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it in my side. (John 20:27)

And it is this physical, truly human, touchable Jesus that the Church proclaims.  Over the ages, there has always been in the Church the tendency to withdraw from the material.  In particular, there have been many concerns about the human body and its sexual functions. And even today, as Christians, we may feel awkward or embarrassed to speak about these things, especially in a religious context.

Everything that God made is good.  And as one medieval mystic liked to say, every created thing is a Word of God.  To those who can see, every created thing, living or inanimate, speaks of God and the Creator.  Few poets have expressed this as well as the English Jesuit, Gerard Manley Hopkins:

There lives the dearest freshness deep down things…The world is charged with the grandeur of God.

This has all been affirmed by the Incarnation, by the infinite Son of God sharing our bodily human nature and all its functions. This Word is life in the sense of being the source of all real living, not just existing.

In John’s Gospel (10:10) we read:

I came that they may have life and have it abundantly.

This sharing of life is an idea most central to John’s spirituality. Unity among all Christians results from the common life shared by Christ between each Christian and God. It is that fellowship (a lovely word) expressing a close union of the believer with Christ (we think of the vine and the fruit-bearing branches), as well as communion with the Father and with all fellow-Christians.

Today’s passage presents a striking parallel to the prologue of John’s Gospel (1:1-18) but, whereas in the Gospel passage the emphasis is more on Jesus as the pre-existent Word, here it is on the Apostles’ witness to the ‘fleshiness’ and the ‘touchability’ of the Jesus they knew.  In the best sense of the words, Jesus was a ‘real man’.

Boo
Comments Off on Saint John, Apostle and Evangelist – First Reading

Saint John, Apostle and Evangelist – Gospel

Tools: Email; Print; Font-size

Commentary on John 20:2-8

From the Gospel, we know that John was the brother of James and the son of Zebedee.  He and his brother were among the first to be called (together with Peter and Andrew) by Jesus. 

Today’s Gospel reading describes the scene where Peter and the “beloved disciple” rush to the tomb of Jesus after being told by Mary Magdalen that his body is no longer there.  Although the “beloved disciple” got there first, he deferred to Peter, who went in first and saw the burial cloths.  One of them—the piece that was wrapped around the face—was rolled up in a separate place.  When the “beloved disciple” went in:

…he saw and believed.

In other words, he understood the significance of the cloth and he knew that his Lord had risen.

Later, the Risen Jesus will say to Thomas:

Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have come to believe. (John 20:29)

Here the disciple did not see the physical Jesus.  Nevertheless, on the basis of what he did see, he believed.

The question is: what exactly did he see?  What he saw was that the cloth which had covered Jesus’ head was not with the rest of the burial cloths, but rolled up in a separate place.  Why should that trigger his conviction that the Lord had risen? 

The book of Exodus (chap 34) describes how Moses, after coming down from the mountain and conversing with God, was so radiant with light that people were afraid to approach him.  And so, he put a veil to cover his face:

…but whenever Moses went in before the Lord to speak with him, he would take the veil off until he came out, and when he came out and told the Israelites what he had been commanded, the Israelites would see the face of Moses, that the skin of his face was shining, and Moses would put the veil on his face again until he went in to speak with him.
(Exod 34:34-35)

Now some believe that the word ‘veil’ used in John is a Greek translation of the word in Hebrew used about Moses.  In other words, the veil covering the face of the dead Jesus is now no longer needed because he has gone face to face with his Father.  This veil was the humanity of Jesus which enabled us to look at our God.  Jesus now has a new human body—his Church.  And that was what led to the “beloved disciple’s” conviction that his Master had risen to new life.

For some commentators, the “beloved disciple” is not actually John, but represents any person who has totally committed himself or herself to the following of Jesus, anyone who deeply believes and anyone who is passionately fond of Jesus.  At times, as in today’s Gospel, the faith of the “beloved disciple” is shown as surpassing that of Peter.  While the disciples we know of had fled after the arrest of Christ, it is the “beloved disciple” who stands with the Mother of Jesus at the foot of the cross.

Nevertheless, John as the author of the Fourth Gospel and the three letters attributed to his name, reveals a depth of faith and insight into the meaning of Christ’s life, death and resurrection that borders on the mystical and clearly reveals a faith of extraordinary depth.  It is a faith and insight we can pray to have for ourselves.

Boo
Comments Off on Saint John, Apostle and Evangelist – Gospel

Saint Joseph Pignatelli, Priest, SJ

Tools: Email; Print; Font-size

Joseph Pignatelli was born of a Spanish mother, and a father who was an Italian noble in 1737. He lived in the family palace in Saragossa (Zaragoza) in north-eastern Spain, about half way between Madrid and Barcelona. When his mother died in 1743, his father moved the family to Naples. Four years later his father died.  In 1749, at the age of 12, he returned to Saragossa and went to the Jesuit College there, living in the Jesuit community house.

On 8 May, 1752, he entered the Jesuit novitiate at Tarragona, south of Barcelona on the Mediterranean coast, and went through the normal formation programme of philosophy and theology. He was ordained a priest the week before Christmas in 1762, and spent the next four-and-a-half years in Saragossa doing ordinary pastoral work, including teaching grammar to young boys and visiting the local prison ministering to prisoners awaiting execution.

The hidden life of an ordinary teacher changed suddenly when, on 3 April, 1767, King Charles III of Spain expelled the Jesuits from his territory and seized their property. Overnight, 5,000 Jesuits lost everything and were left without a roof over their heads. Joseph might have used his aristocratic background to stay on in Spain, but he chose to go with his Jesuit brothers into exile.

The elderly superior at Saragossa, anticipating the difficulties ahead, passed his authority to the 30-year-old Joseph.  On arriving in Tarragona, the Saragossa Jesuits found other Jesuits also waiting to be deported.  Among them was the provincial superior, who also passed his authority on to Joseph, in effect making him superior of 600 or so Jesuits.

A fleet of 13 ships was needed to carry the Jesuit exiles to Italy.  However, they were not permitted to land at Civita Vecchia on Italy’s west coast nor at Bastia, a port in Corsica.  They were finally able to come ashore at Bonifacio, at the southern tip of Corsica.  They were only able to stay there for a year, when France acquired the island from Genoa in September, 1768 (thus making a Frenchman of its most famous inhabitant, Napoleon Bonaparte!).

Again crowded into ships, the Jesuits were brought to Genoa, and then had a 500 km trek to Ferrara, in the Papal States.  It was a difficult and tiring journey for those who were elderly or in bad health.  Thanks to Monsignor Francesco Pignatelli, a cousin of Joseph, the Jesuits were welcomed in Ferrara. 

But their situation was still precarious, because the rulers of Europe were pressuring Pope Clement XIII to suppress the Society everywhere.  He resisted, but his successor, Clement XIV, gave in and on 21 July, 1773, with his brief Dominus ac Redemptor noster, abolished the Society.  Suddenly its 23,000 members were now ex-Jesuits and no longer bound by their vows.

The priests, of course, were still priests, but those in formation and the Brothers were now just laymen.  Joseph (now an ex-Jesuit priest) moved to Bologna and from there maintained contact with his brothers scattered in many places.

There was one striking exception to the decree of suppression.  Catherine the Great of Russia had not allowed the papal brief to be promulgated in her territories.  This meant that, technically, the Society of Jesus continued to exist in White Russia (now Belarus). So Joseph wrote to the Jesuit provincial superior there asking to be re-admitted to the Society. 

At the same time, Ferdinand, Duke of Parma, also wanted to have Jesuits in his territory and began negotiating with the Jesuits in Russia.  In 1793, three Jesuits went to set up a Jesuit community in his duchy.  Joseph became a member of this group and on 6 July, 1797, at the age of 60, again pronounced his vows as a Jesuit.  Two years later, he became the novice master at Colorno, the only Jesuit novitiate in Western Europe at the time.

On 7 May, 1803, the Russian superior named Joseph as provincial superior of Italy, although the Society was still suppressed in most of the country (including the Papal States).  However, this haven was not to last.  When French forces seized the Duchy of Parma in 1804, the Jesuits had to move on to Naples.  This was possible because Pope Pius VIII, by a special letter of 30 July, 1804, restored the Society in the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies.  But Joseph was able to stay there for only two years. When Joseph Bonaparte, Napoleon’s brother, took over the Kingdom, non-native Jesuits were forced to leave. 

Finally, in 1806, the Jesuits were welcomed by Pope Pius VII in Rome where they set up a community at St Pantaleon’s, near the Roman Coliseum, followed soon after by a novitiate in Orvieto. After 40 years of a life in exile, Joseph was full of hope that the Society would be fully restored, even though he might not live to see it.

During the last two years of his life, his health deteriorated and he suffered from haemorrhages, perhaps caused by stomach ulcers.  In October 1811, he was confined to his bed and died peacefully about a month later on 15 November, in his 74th year.  Just three years later, in 1814, Pope Pius VII fully restored the Society of Jesus.

Joseph Pignatelli was canonized by Pope Pius XII in 1954, and is remembered for his kindness, humility, gracious manner, as well as for his undaunted courage in keeping his exiled companions united in spirit.  He is, in some respects, almost regarded a second founder of the Order.

Boo
Comments Off on Saint Joseph Pignatelli, Priest, SJ

Saint John Chrysostom, Bishop and Doctor

Tools: Email; Print; Font-size

John Chrysostom was born in 347, the son of an army officer at Antioch in Syria. His father died soon after his birth and he was brought up by his widowed mother. She saw to it that he was well educated in oratory and law (‘Chrysostom’, a later acquired name, means ‘golden-mouthed’). From about 373, he became a monk in a mountain community not far from the city, and like many other holy men, damaged his health through excessive austerities as well as the uncongenial surroundings of his cave hermitage. He spent long periods standing, and did not have sufficient sleep because of spending his time learning the Bible by heart. As a result, his stomach and kidneys were permanently damaged and poor health forced him to leave his hermitage and return to Antioch.

He also began to make his name as a preacher and commentator on the letters of Paul and the Gospels of Matthew and John. Against the Antiochene tradition, he emphasised the direct rather than the allegorical meaning of Scripture and how it could be applied to the problems of the age. In this sense, much of his writing is still relevant to our own day.

He gained political fame through his 21 sermons on The Statues in 387. These statues, representing the Emperor Theodosius, his father, dead wife and sons, had been smashed in a riot against the emperor’s taxation policy. Although reprisals were expected, an amnesty was won by the elderly bishop Flavian. Chrysostom’s sermons also helped bring peace and understanding to the issue.

Following the death of the Archbishop of Constantinople in 397, the Emperor Arcadius wanted John Chrysostom to take his place. Fearing opposition from the people, an envoy was sent to bring him secretly from Antioch. Theophilus, the Patriarch of Alexandria and uncle of the future Cyril of Alexandria, performed the consecration in 398, though he had actually coveted the post for himself.

John began immediately to reform the moral corruption of the imperial court, the clergy and the people. He reduced the expenditure on his own household and spent the money on the poor and on hospitals. He imposed strict discipline on the clergy, which some regarded as too severe.

He also attacked the behaviour, dress and bodily decoration of the women at court and condemned Christians who went to the races on Good Friday and to games in the stadium on Holy Saturday. The Empress Eudoxia, probably with some justification, regarded many of these reforms as personally directed against her. It did not help when a statue of her was set up outside the cathedral of Santa Sophia. Its dedication was honoured by public games—an occasion for superstitious and immoral behaviour.

Theophilus, who had wanted the see of Constantinople for himself, now began supporting the empress. He brought together a number of bishops who gathered in Chalcedon. They condemned John in his absence with false or distorted charges. They also accused him of treason for calling the empress ‘Jezebel’. They called for his banishment, and he was sent into exile. However, an earthquake in Constantinople frightened the superstitious empress and John was brought back to the city.

Undaunted, Chrysostom continued his verbal attacks which made the empress angry again. Theophilus once more turned against him by appealing to an Arian council in Antioch. Once again, Chrysostom was banished. The accusation was that he had assumed authority in a diocese from which he had been ‘lawfully deposed’.

Although his people were behind him and he had the support of the pope and many western bishops, he was exiled once again in 404. He first went to Armenia and then to Pontus.

John died on 14 September, 407, in the city of Comana on his way to his place of exile. He died as the result of the hardships of enforced travel on foot and in exhausting circumstances. There his remains rested until 438 when, thirty years after his death, they were transferred to the Church of the Apostles in Constantinople during the reign of the Empress Eudoxia’s son, Emperor Theodosius II (408-450), under the guidance of John’s disciple, St Proclus, who by that time had become Archbishop of Constantinople.

His relics were looted from Constantinople by the Crusaders in 1204 and brought to Rome, but were returned to the Orthodox Church by Pope John Paul II. His silver and jewel-encrusted skull is now kept in the Vatopedi Monastery on Mount Athos in northern Greece, and is credited by Eastern Orthodox with miraclulous healings. His right hand is also preserved on Mount Athos, and numerous smaller relics are scattered throughout the world.

In the Western Church, he is invoked as one of the Four Greek Doctors (with Athanasius, Basil, and Gregory of Nazianzus) and in the East as one of the Three Holy Hierarchs and Universal Teachers. His scripture commentaries and a treatise on the priesthood are his best known writings.

The following are examples of some of his more trenchant sayings:

-It is not possible for one to be wealthy and just at the same time.

-Do you pay such honour to your excrements as to receive them into a silver chamber-pot when another man made in the image of God is perishing in the cold?

-Do you wish to honour the body of Christ? Do not ignore him when he is naked. Do not pay him homage in the temple clad in silk, only then to neglect him outside where he is cold and ill-clad. He who said: “This is my body” is the same who said: “You saw me hungry and you gave me no food”, and “Whatever you did to the least of my brothers you did also to me…” What good is it if the Eucharistic table is overloaded with golden chalices when your brother is dying of hunger? Start by satisfying his hunger and then with what is left you may adorn the altar as well.

Boo
Comments Off on Saint John Chrysostom, Bishop and Doctor

Saint John Chrysostom, Bishop and Doctor- Readings

Tools: Email; Print; Font-size

Commentary on Ephesians 4:1-7,11-13; Psalm 39; Mark 4:1-10,13-20

The Gospel reading is the Parable of the Sower as told by Mark. We are told that Jesus began teaching beside the shore of the Lake of Galilee. So many people came to listen to him that he had to get into one of his disciple’s boats and preach from there. He sat down (the position of a teacher) while the people were on the shore. There is, of course, a symbolism in the boat which here, and in other parts of Mark, clearly represents the church. Even now we sometimes speak about the Church as the ‘Barque of Peter’.

Jesus then proceeds to tell a parable about a farmer who goes out to sow seed in his field. It is a typical and not very fertile Palestinian field. We need to realise also that in those days the farmer would scatter the seed all over the field and only then plough the field. That explains the situation as the parable unfolds. Some of the seed falls on a path which is probably a ‘short cut’ going across the field. Here the seed has no hope of taking root and is promptly picked up by birds. Some of the seed falls on crevices in some rocks. There may be little pools of water in crannies so the seed begins to take root. But then the sun comes up, it dries up the water and the new plants wither away. Some of the seed falls on briars and weeds on the unploughed field. It takes root, but in time it is choked by the brambles and does not produce any grain. Lastly, some seed falls on fertile ground and produces fruit with various yields.

In every parable there is just one message. Here it is that God’s Word (the seed) is directed to every person without exception and, although it many cases it seems to fail, it will definitely succeed in producing the desired fruit.

The second part of the reading is a response to the disciples’ not getting the point of Jesus’ parable. In the explanation it appears now to more like an allegory. In a parable there is just one image, while in an allegory, each element is a symbol of something. So whereas in the parable the emphasis is just on the seed; in the explanation it is rather on the different kinds of soil in which the seed falls.

So the seed falling on stony ground is like those who hear the Word, but immediately the Evil One moves in and snatches it away. It does not even get started. The seed that falls on rocky ground is like those who hear the Word with great enthusiasm but, as soon as they face any difficulty, fall away. This must often have been the situation in the early Church when enthusiastic new converts dropped off at the first sign of persecution.

The seed that falls among the brambles is like those who accept the Word with joy, but very soon the temptations of the material world, ambition and the desire for money take over and stifle the Word. Most probably, there are very few of us who do not fall to some degree in this group.

Finally, the seed falls on rich, fertile soil where it is totally and unconditionally accepted. Then it produces fruit in abundance and is a source for the planting of seed elsewhere.

The First Reading from the Letter of St Paul to the Ephesians describes the various charisms or vocations that we, individually, are gifted by the Holy Spirit. John Chrysostom (Chrysostom means “golden mouthed”) was a famous preacher of the Word. And while many hung on his every word, there were many who did not want to listen to him, especially those – both clerics and lay people – who did not like his condemnations of their materialistic and corrupt ways of living. He was twice driven into exile by fellow clerics and died in exile.

Boo
Comments Off on Saint John Chrysostom, Bishop and Doctor- Readings

Saint Francis of Assisi

Tools: Email; Print; Font-size

Francis was born, one of seven children, on 26 September, 1181, the son of Pietro di Bernardone, a wealthy cloth merchant, and his wife Pica Bourlemont in Assisi, a city within Tuscany, Italy. He was baptised John, in honour of John the Baptist, but was called Francesco (Italian for ‘French’), because at the time of his birth his father was doing very good business in France. As a young man, he helped his father in running the family business, but was also prominent in the social life of the pleasure-seeking well-off. During a war between Assisi and Perugia, Francis was imprisoned for a year and became seriously ill. Soon afterwards, still in his military gear, he deserted—abandoning the war and running the risk of being deemed a coward.

Already at this stage his concern for the poor and outcasts (such as lepers) was noticeable. One day he heard a voice which seemed to come from a crucifix in the small rundown church of San Damiano in Assisi. It said:

Francis, Francis, go and repair my house which, as you can see, is falling into ruins.

Francis understood the words literally and immediately got to work. He sold some of his father’s cloth in order to pay for the repairs. This led to a lengthy dispute with his father ending with Francis renouncing his inheritance and getting rid of his fancy and expensive clothes. The bishop of Assisi gave him some simple attire and Francis embarked on a totally new way of living.

In the beginning, his aim was primarily devotional. He wanted to be close to Christ on the Cross. But later he would also declare his allegiance to Lady Poverty, using the contemporary language of courtly love. He began to lead a life of extreme simplicity. With money he begged from the people of Assisi he was able to rebuild the church of San Damiano. In fact, he restored several ruined churches, among them the Porziuncola, the little chapel of St Mary of the Angels, just outside Assisi, which later became his favorite abode.

He became a wandering beggar in solidarity with those who were genuinely poor—and there would have been many. He looked after social outcasts, especially lepers (and those who were thought to have leprosy). There is the famous image of him overcoming his distaste and fear by embracing a leper. Then seven other men joined him. They lived together at the Porziuncula in Assisi, close to a leper colony.

At the end of this period (~1209) Francis heard a sermon about chapter 10 of Matthew’s Gospel which changed his life. In it, Jesus tells his followers to go forth and proclaim the imminent coming of the Reign of God. On the way, they are to take no money nor even a walking stick or shoes for the road. Clad in a rough garment, barefoot without staff or purse, he began to preach a message of repentance. Within a year Francis had eleven followers. Francis chose never to be ordained a priest and the community lived as “lesser brothers” (fratres minores)—the name by which the order is still known. The brothers lived a simple life in the abandoned leper house of Rivo Torto near Assisi. They spent much of their time as wandering preachers in Umbria bringing a message of cheer and song and making a deep impression on the people. One factor which differentiated them from other groups of poor preachers was their obvious respect and obedience to Church leaders and the orthodoxy of their teaching.

In 1209, Francis led his followers to Rome to seek permission from Pope Innocent III to found a new religious order. The pope agreed to meet with Francis and his companions. He consented to an informal recognition of the group and, when they had increased in numbers, they could return for more formal recognition. The group then received the tonsure and Francis himself was ordained deacon, allowing him to read the Gospel in church. Obedience to the pope would be a central feature of Francis’ First Rule (Regula Prima) drawn up and approved in 1210.

Their missionary apostolate continued to grow and reach more people and Francis’ sermons were becoming more popular. After preaching, the friars would return to their community house for their liturgy and personal prayer. They lived the simple lives of ordinary working people, supplementing their income when necessary, by begging. They lived in simple huts. Their churches were small. They slept on the floor without tables or chairs and only a very few books. It would be only later that some of them became well-known theologians. One of the most outstanding of these would be St Bonaventure.

Among those who heard Francis preach was Clare of Assisi and she immediately knew to what she was called. Her brother Rufino, too, joined the new order. On Palm Sunday, 28 March, 1211, Francis received Clare at the Porziuncola and thus was founded the Order of Poor Dames, later called Poor Clares.

Francis longed to reach out further in his preaching and thought specially of the Muslim Saracens against whom the Crusaders were fighting. In 1212, he set off for the Middle East, but his ship was shipwrecked in present-day Croatia. Two years later, in 1214, he set out for Morocco through Spain, but became so ill he had to turn back. In 1219, Francis and a few companions left on a pilgrimage of peace to Egypt. Crossing the lines between the Saracens and the Crusaders in Damietta, he was received by Sultan Melek-el-Kamel. Francis made a deep impression on the Sultan, but failed to convert him to Christianity. He refused the expensive gifts the Sultan wanted to give him and returned to the Crusaders. Altogether he spent some months as a pilgrim in Palestine. At Acre, the capital of what remained of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, he rejoined Brothers Elia and Pietro Cattini and most probably visited the holy places in 1220.

Then he was urgently called back to Italy because of developments in the Order which seemed to compromise his original ideals of simple living. The friars had increased greatly in numbers (up to 5,000) and new houses were being established outside Italy. The greater numbers now called for better organisation and administration which Francis’ simple rules could not deal with. The Church authorities, too, saw the Order as an important instrument of reform, even to making some of the friars bishops. Francis felt that this might compromise the witness through poverty which was in itself a criticism of the materialist attitudes affecting the Church. Francis then resigned his position as Minister General at the General Chapter of 1220. He was very much aware that he was not the kind of administrator the Order needed in developing along these new lines.

He was succeeded by Brother Elias of Cortona. In 1221, Francis drew up another Rule. After some changes, it was finally approved as the Regula Bullata by Pope Honorius III. The Order now had the full approval of the Church authorities, but it involved concessions with which Francis was not at all happy. In 1221, Francis also initiated the Third Order by which married people could live according to the Franciscan spirituality.

It is in the later years of his life that some of the best known events took place. They include the setting up of a Christmas crib at Grecchio. It is said that Francis—who was never more than a deacon—read the Gospel with such passion that people wept. The famous Canticle of the Sun was written in 1224 when he visited Clare, who was seriously ill at the time. And it was also in 1224 that, during an ecstasy, he experienced the stigmata, by which the wounds of the crucified Jesus appeared on his body. While praying on the mountain of La Verna, during a 40-day fast in preparation for Michaelmas (29 September), Francis is said to have had a vision on or about 14 September, 1224, the Feast of the Exaltation of the Cross, as a result of which he received the stigmata. His companion, Brother Leo, later wrote:

Suddenly he saw a vision of a seraph, a six-winged angel on a cross. This angel gave him the gift of the five wounds of Christ.

It was soon after this that Francis became ill and blind. He suffered greatly from well-intentioned, but crude surgery. In the end he was brought back to the transito, the hut for sick friars, next to the Porziuncola. Here, in the place where it all began and feeling the end approaching, he spent the last days of his life dictating his spiritual testament. He died on the evening of 3 October, 1226, singing Psalm 141. He was just 45 years of age.

Francis was canonized, only two years after his death, on 16 July, 1228, by Pope Gregory IX, formerly Cardinal Ugolino and a long-time friend and patron of the Order. The following day, the pope laid the foundation stone for the Basilica of Saint Francis in Assisi. On 25 May, 1230, he was buried under the Lower Basilica. His burial place remained inaccessible until it was rediscovered in 1818. A crypt in neo-classical style was constructed under the Lower Basilica, but between 1927-30 it was redesigned by removing the marble decorations. In 1978, Francis’ remains were identified by a commission of scholars appointed by Pope Paul VI, and placed in a glass urn in the old stone tomb. Assisi is now a pilgrimage centre for people from all over the world.

Over the centuries, Francis has become one of the Catholic Church’s most loved saints. Some of this devotion, however, borders on the sentimental. He has been cultivated by nature lovers and even by ‘new agers’ while ignoring the heart of his spirituality—his devotion to the suffering Jesus and his commitment to a poor and simple life. He has been a genuine source of inspiration for many, not least of whom was Charles de Foucauld who perhaps went even further than Francis in his austere style of life.

After his death, many legends arose about him and these are collected in the Little Flowers of St Francis, a book whose popularity still endures. In art too, Francis has been a favourite subject, beginning with the artist Cimabue.

He is regarded as the patron saint of animals, birds, the environment, and Italy. It is common for Christian churches to hold ceremonies honouring animals around his feast day on October 4.

Boo
Comments Off on Saint Francis of Assisi


Printed from LivingSpace - part of Sacred Space
Copyright © 2025 Sacred Space :: www.sacredspace.com :: All rights reserved.